She would jump from a ferry to Nanaimo into the frigid October water to end more than a year of suffering from what she was told was a terminal illness. A judge ruled that, because she was almost years-old, her death is reasonably foreseeable and therefore she was approved for medically assisted death. Ellen Wiebe to provide A. The court approved the death on March 17 and the man died of the lethal injection the following day.
Summary Voluntary euthanasia is unnecessary because alternative treatments exist It is widely believed that there are only two options open to patients with terminal illness: In fact, there is a middle way, that of creative and compassionate caring.
Meticulous research in Palliative medicine has in recent years shown that virtually all unpleasant symptoms experienced in the process of terminal illness can be either relieved or substantially alleviated by techniques already available.
This has had its practical expression in the hospice movement, which has enabled patients symptoms to be managed either at home or in the context of a caring in-patient facility.
It is no surprise that in the Netherlands, where euthanasia is now accepted, there is only a very rudimentary hospice movement.
By contrast, in the UK, which has well developed facilities to care specifically for the terminally ill, a House of Lords committee recently ruled that there should be no change in the law to allow euthanasia.
There are indeed many having suboptimal care. This is usually because facilities do not exist in the immediate area or because local medical practitioners lack the training and skills necessary to manage terminally ill patients properly. The solution to this is to make appropriate and effective care and training more widely available, not to give doctors the easy option of euthanasia.
A law enabling euthanasia will undermine individual and corporate incentives for creative caring. Requests for voluntary euthanasia are rarely free and voluntary A patient with a terminal illness is vulnerable.
He lacks the knowledge and skills to alleviate his own symptoms, and may well be suffering from fear about the future and anxiety about the effect his illness is having on others. It is very difficult for him to be entirely objective about his own situation.
Those who regularly manage terminally ill patients recognise that they often suffer from depression or a false sense of worthlessness which may affect their judgment. Their decision-making may equally be affected by confusion, dementia or troublesome symptoms which could be relieved with appropriate treatment.
Terminally ill patients also adapt to a level of disability that they would not have previously anticipated they could live with. They come to value what little quality of life they have left. Many elderly people already feel a burden to family, carers and a society which is cost conscious and may be short of resources.
These patients need to hear that they are valued and loved as they are. They need to know that we are committed first and foremost to their well-being, even if this does involve expenditure of time and money. The way we treat the weakest and most vulnerable people speaks volumes about the kind of society we are.
Voluntary euthanasia denies patients the final stage of growth It is during the time of a terminal illness that people have a unique opportunity to reflect on the way they have lived their lives, to make amends for wrongs done, to provide for the future security of loved ones and to prepare mentally and spiritually for their own death.
Not all make full use of this opportunity, but those involved in hospice work often observe a mending of family relationships and rediscovery of mutual love and responsibility that may not have been evident for years.
It is often through facing the hardship that terminal illness brings, and through learning to accept the practical help of others that human character and maturity develops most fully. Death if properly managed can be the final stage of growth. Losing the opportunity of caring for vulnerable people denies us an essential part of our humanity.A.
AGS Ethics Committee, Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia.
Journal of American Geriatrics Society, May , 43(5) Professor David E. Richmond MB ChB MHPEd. MD FRACP FRCP(Lond.) (See biographical details at the end of this article) Executive Summary The proposed legislation to legalise voluntary euthanasia should be rejected because.
Olivia is a very funny bunny! She enjoys carrot and pear as treats, and prefers to sprawl out on the carpet rather than in a bed. She has excellent litter habits and loves having time out to roam and play. The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia [Neil M. Gorsuch, John Pruden] on alphabetnyc.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia provides the most thorough overview of the ethical and legal issues raised by assisted suicide and euthanasia - as well as the most comprehensive argument against their legalization - ever published. Why it's morally wrong.
Why Assisted Suicide Is Wrong - TFP Student Action Here are 10 reasons why physician assisted suicide or euthanasia are morally repugnant to God. Why Euthanasia is Wrong Essay.
Words 6 Pages “Thou Shalt Not Kill” (Exodus ). One of the Ten Commandments put forward by God to Moses at the top of Mount Sinai. The killing of another human being is morally wrong and unacceptable.
No one has the right to take away another persons life, whether it be through hatred and disgust.