Schools and non-formal education programs must include HIV education. The DOH must conduct public health education campaigns. The government must provide education for Filipinos going abroad. Employers, working with DOLE must develop workplace education and safety.
Philippine Legal Advice No Comments 16th Apr The recent death of a freshman law student on 19 February due to hazing compounded by the promulgation by the Supreme Court of its decision concerning the death of Lenny Villa on February due to a fraternity hazing, have sparked the interest of the public on the prevailing laws governing hazing.
Contrary to popular belief, hazing per se is not prohibited but merely regulated.
What is absolutely prohibited is the employment of physical violence in hazing. Prior written notice to the school authorities or head of Summary of ra 8504 seven 7 days before the conduct of such initiation 2.
The written notice shall indicate the period of the initiation activities which shall not exceed three 3 days, shall include the names of those to be subjected to such activities. The written notice shall contain an undertaking that no physical violence be employed by anybody during such initiation rites.
At least two 2 representatives of the school or organization should be present during the initiation. It is the duty of such representative to see to it that no physical harm of any kind shall be inflicted upon a recruit, neophyte or applicant.
Before the enactment of RAthere was no law punishing the act of hazing. Hence, the courts had to look at the Revised Penal Code for the criminal liability of the accused. As such, in the Lenny Villa Case, the accused were held liable for reckless imprudence resulting into homicide.
With the advent of RAsome acts of hazing have been criminalized and correspondingly punished as follows: The penalty of reclusion perpetua life imprisonment if death, rape, sodomy or Summary of ra 8504 results there from. The penalty of reclusion temporal in its maximum period 17 years, 4 months and 1 day to 20 years if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall become insane, imbecile, impotent or blind.
The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period 14 years, 8 months and one day to 17 years and 4 months if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have lost the use of speech or the power to hear or to smell, or shall have lost an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm or a leg or shall have lost the use of any such member shall have become incapacitated for the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged.
The penalty of reclusion temporal in its minimum period 12 years and one day to 14 years and 8 months if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall become deformed or shall have lost any other part of his body, or shall have lost the use thereof, or shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance on the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for a period of more than ninety 90 days.
The penalty of prison mayor in its maximum period 10 years and one day to 12 years if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance on the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for a period of more than thirty 30 days.
The penalty of prison mayor in its medium period 8 years and one day to 10 years if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance on the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged for a period of ten 10 days or more, or that the injury sustained shall require medical assistance for the same period.
The penalty of prison mayor in its minimum period 6 years and one day to 8 years if in consequence of the hazing the victim shall have been ill or incapacitated for the performance on the activity or work in which he was habitually engaged from one 1 to nine 9 days, or that the injury sustained shall require medical assistance for the same period.
The penalty of prison correccional in its maximum period 4 years, 2 months and one day to 6 years if in consequence of the hazing the victim sustained physical injuries which do not prevent him from engaging in his habitual activity or work nor require medical attendance.
The officers and members of the fraternity, sorority or organization who actually participated in the infliction of physical harm shall be liable as principals.
The presence of any person during the hazing is prima facie evidence of participation therein as principal unless he prevented the commission of the acts. Furthermore, the officers, former officers, or alumni of the organization, group, fraternity or sorority who actually planned the hazing although not present when the acts constituting the hazing were committed shall also be liable as principals.
Third parties are also punished by RA In fact, the owner of the place where hazing is conducted shall be liable as an accomplice, when he has actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring.
If the hazing is held in the home of one of the officers or members of the fraternity, group, or organization, the parents shall be held liable as principals when they have actual knowledge of the hazing conducted therein but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring.
The same goes for the school authorities who consent to the hazing or who have actual knowledge thereof, but failed to take any action to prevent the same from occurring.
Some camps advocate for the amendment of RA to better address the recurring problem of hazing. In fact, the Supreme Court proposed to include the fact of intoxication and the presence of non-resident or alumni fraternity members during hazing as aggravating circumstances that would increase the applicable penalties.
However, let us not lose sight of the fact that the problem also lies in the enforcement of the law. Furthermore, the various institutions involved in this problem should also take an active role in educating the youth and dispelling the tradition of violence.
You may visit us at the 16th Flr.Republic Act No. THE CONSUMER ACT OF THE PHILIPPINES 2. This law is designed to prevent business that engage in fraud or specified unfair practices from gaining an advantage over competitors and provide additional protection for the weak and those unable to take care of themselves.
alphabetnyc.com summary Ultimately. R. lays down the mechanisms for & defines the roles of government & the general public in responding to the health threat. promotes and protects the rights of PLHIVs. Characteristics of Initial Prescription Episodes and Likelihood of Long-Term Opioid Use — United States, – Republic Act No.
TOBACCO REGULATION ACT OF REPUBLIC ACT NO.
AN ACT REGULATING THE PACKAGING, USE, SALE DISTRIBUTION AND ADVERTISEMENTS OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Section 1. Short Title. - This Act shall be known as the "Tobacco Regulation Act of " Sec. 2. Policy.
Feb. 13, Enactment of R.A. ; April 13, Promulgation of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A.
AIDS is a disease that recognizes no territorial, social, political and economic boundaries, and has no known cure up to this day; The gravity of . Under RA , in order for hazing to be valid, the following conditions must be complied with: 1.
Prior written notice to the school authorities or head of organization seven (7) .